Round Rock, TX - Round Rock, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHOUN Minwook | D V V D V V | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 2 | CHEN Andrew | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 3 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | V D V V D V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 4 | -1.8 |
| 5 | SONG Aiden S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 6 | SONG Dylan S. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | JEON Caleb A. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 8 | MURRAY Maximo | V V V D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 9 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 11 | REYES Omar | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 12 | MITCHELL Philip D. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 13 | WANG Andrew | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 14 | GODZHIK Zachary | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | CHAN Tyler | V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 16 | XIAO EDWARD | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 17 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | GRAHAM Roy J. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 19 | LUH Ethan K. | D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | ZHANG Andy W. | V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | CHEN Allen | V V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 22 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | NEWELL Ian A. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 24 | KUO Evan | V V D D V V | V D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 25 | GORBACHEV Alexander | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 26 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 27 | GOH Andrew Y. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 28 | OH Jonathan | D D V V V V | V | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 29 | LAKE Wyatt J. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 30 | LI Peihong | D V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 31 | LI Richard | V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 32 | LEE Aidan | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 33 | KEE Andrew L. | V D V V V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 34 | REEVES Liam | V D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 35 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | V D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 36 | GAO Ryan | V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 37 | DAI Jonathan T. | V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 38 | ZHOU Oscar J. | D V D V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 39 | XIANG Derrick | D V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 40 | YANG Luao | V V D V D D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 41 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | V D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 42 | JIANG Owen | V D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 43 | DORAN Wesley C. | V D D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 43 | STEVENS Paul S. | V D V V D D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 45 | KIM BANSEOK | D V D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 46 | GILLIAM Jason E. | D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 47 | BATANG Cergio Manuel A. | V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 48 | SCHOENBERGER Xander S. | D D V V D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 49 | HUANG Kevin D. | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 50 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | D D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 51 | MENG Zhaoyi | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 52 | FINNEY Lorenz | V D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 53 | AIBEL Hudson J. | D V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 54 | IVES William R. | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 55 | HEARN Christen J. | D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 56 | ZHENG Jadon | D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 57 | KISS Phillip A. | D D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 58 | KIM Derek A. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 58 | ZHOU Joseph H. | D D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 60 | KIM Ryan Y. | D D V D D D | V | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 61 | LIU Michael H. | V D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 62 | OH Joshua | D D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 63 | PIERCE Cody | D D D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 64 | BAO Aaron | D D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 65 | WEEKS Richard P. | D D V D D D | D | 4.9 | 1 | -3.9 |
| 66 | CHIN Ryan | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 67 | SEALE Cougar | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 68 | SHAH Shrey | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 69 | ZHENG zhe | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 70 | PRASANNA Advaith | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 71 | CUTTER Jackson | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 73 | XU Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 74 | APPL Eli | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.