King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 2 | BINDAS Odinn A. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 3 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | PARK Frederick | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 5 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 6 | TAHOUN Aly | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 7 | LAI Aiden | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 8 | THAKUR Om S. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 9 | CHEN Jun Ho | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 10 | PARK Nicholas | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 11 | CHERPELIS George | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 12 | KNOX James | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | ARAVIND Athreya | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
| 14 | SUN James H. | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG William | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | MALHAM Andrew | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | MAHESH Tarun | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 19 | KUMAR Aidan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
| 21 | XIE Brandon | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 22 | CHANG Benjamin | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | KWOUN Miles S. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHANG ethan | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 25 | TRULL A.J. | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | RIPA Joseph K. | 12% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | LAI Boden | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HU Robert J. | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | TRUBETSKI David | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.