Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LEVY Jacob M. | D V V V D D | V V V V V V V | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
2 | BURKE Spencer W. | V D V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
3 | AYUPOV Ilya | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
3 | OTAKE Jared K. | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
5 | KUMBLA Samarth | V V V D V | V V V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
6 | BANERJEE ANUP | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
7 | KELLY William J. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
8 | DARIANO Noah G. | D D D D D | V V V V D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
9 | GRIFFIN John O. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
10 | LAO Scott E. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
11 | GOOR Julian | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
12 | CHIN Jason Y. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V D V D V | V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
14 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
15 | JAIN Aditya | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
16 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | V V D V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
17 | JEON Caleb A. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
18 | DIERKS Kian | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
19 | GRANT Lachlan K. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
20 | CHIN Julian S. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
21 | KIM Brandon J. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
22 | KO Brian J. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
23 | DICKSON Farr R. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
24 | TSANG Matthew K. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
25 | OH Samuel H. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
26 | HAN Andersen Y. | V V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
27 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | V V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
28 | LI Raphael C. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
29 | ZHENG Alan H. | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
30 | HOBSON Aaron K. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
31 | ZHANG Luke T. | D V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
32 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | D D V V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
33 | VAZQUEZ Zander | V V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
34 | KIM Aaron J. | V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
35 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
36 | DIVITO Dylan | V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
37 | XIAO EDWARD | D V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
38 | PAEK Alex J. | V D V V V D | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
39 | WU Jerry Z. | V V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
40 | HONG Daniel | V D D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
41 | HODESS Ethan | V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
42 | CHENG Matthew S. | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
43 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
44 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | D V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
44 | YU Anders | V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
46 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
47 | KELLY Benjamin J. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
48 | GOLDADE Luke A. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
49 | KUZMAK Michael J. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
50 | THAI William | V V V D D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
51 | MO Jason | V D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
52 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
53 | WU Conrad J. | V V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
54 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
55 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | D V D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
56 | WANG Andrew | D D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
57 | ZHENG zhe | D V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
58 | PIESNER Zachary C. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
59 | KIM Ryan Y. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
60 | HSIUNG Richie | D D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
61 | LE Jacob W. | D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
62 | PATINO Yahir | D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
63 | LLIDO Soren | D D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
64 | NGUYEN Liam | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
65 | FARQUHARSON Cole | V D D V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
65 | DETERING Julian | V D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
67 | KIM Derek A. | V D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
68 | KIM Banseok J. | V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
69 | BARTEL Jacob L. | D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
70 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
71 | HUANG Kevin D. | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
72 | BAEK David | D D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
73 | GOBBO Alexander | D D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
74 | LIEBERMAN Grant | D D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
75 | OH Jaden | D D V V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
76 | MCCOSH Evin M. | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
77 | JEFFERY Jakob | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
78 | LI Avery Peihong | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
79 | LIM Charles Q. | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
80 | LI Ryan Z. | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
81 | AVRON Case B. | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
82 | DORMAN Patrick | D V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
83 | RAINS Jackson T. | D V D D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
84 | BERK Theodore | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
85 | PIALLING Mikhail | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
86 | PARK Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
87 | WOMACH Tristan | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
88 | GUO Hairuo | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
89 | CHUANG Kian J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
90 | HARRIS Rhonen | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
91 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
92 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.