Fortune Fencing ROC, VET & RJCC Reg Opens 2/1

Div I-A Men's Foil

Saturday, May 29, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LEVY Jacob M. - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
2 BURKE Spencer W. - 1% 6% 26% 43% 24%
3 AYUPOV Ilya - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
3 OTAKE Jared K. - 1% 6% 25% 43% 25%
5 KUMBLA Samarth - - 3% 20% 51% 25%
6 BANERJEE ANUP - - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
7 KELLY William J. - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 26%
8 DARIANO Noah G. 2% 14% 35% 35% 12% 1%
9 GRIFFIN John O. - - - - 3% 26% 71%
10 LAO Scott E. - 1% 10% 31% 40% 17%
11 GOOR Julian - 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4%
12 CHIN Jason Y. - - 2% 16% 44% 38%
13 ZENG Lucas H. - - - 3% 16% 43% 38%
14 FUKUDA Alessio R. - - 2% 14% 38% 36% 9%
15 JAIN Aditya - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
16 FUKUDA Renzo K. - 1% 10% 32% 40% 17%
17 JEON Caleb A. - - - 3% 16% 41% 40%
18 DIERKS Kian - 3% 16% 35% 33% 11% 1%
19 GRANT Lachlan K. - 1% 7% 28% 45% 19%
20 CHIN Julian S. - - 4% 20% 42% 29% 5%
21 KIM Brandon J. - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
22 KO Brian J. - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
23 DICKSON Farr R. - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
24 TSANG Matthew K. - - 1% 11% 32% 40% 16%
25 OH Samuel H. - - 1% 6% 26% 48% 20%
26 HAN Andersen Y. 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
27 MURUHIN Yaroslav - 4% 18% 36% 30% 10% 1%
28 LI Raphael C. - - 2% 15% 39% 38% 6%
29 ZHENG Alan H. - 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
30 HOBSON Aaron K. - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
31 ZHANG Luke T. - 6% 27% 40% 22% 4%
32 SUNG Chang-Han S. 2% 15% 41% 35% 8% -
33 VAZQUEZ Zander - 1% 8% 29% 38% 20% 4%
34 KIM Aaron J. 1% 12% 38% 38% 10% 1%
35 GIRALDO Pablo E. - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
36 DIVITO Dylan - - 1% 10% 43% 46%
37 XIAO EDWARD - 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 2%
38 PAEK Alex J. - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
39 WU Jerry Z. - 1% 10% 29% 36% 19% 3%
40 HONG Daniel - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
41 HODESS Ethan 2% 16% 38% 33% 10% 1%
42 CHENG Matthew S. 1% 9% 32% 38% 17% 3%
43 SODERBERG Alex Z. 5% 22% 36% 26% 9% 1%
44 PHAM-CHANG Duke A. 12% 36% 35% 15% 3% -
44 YU Anders 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 5%
46 SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. - 1% 11% 33% 38% 15% 1%
47 KELLY Benjamin J. - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
48 GOLDADE Luke A. - 4% 21% 41% 28% 6% -
49 KUZMAK Michael J. - 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% -
50 THAI William - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
51 MO Jason 3% 22% 41% 27% 7% 1% -
52 CAI Jason Zhicheng 1% 9% 31% 38% 18% 3%
53 WU Conrad J. 2% 15% 37% 34% 11% 1%
54 TSAY Jeremy M. 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
55 JOHNSTON Conner S. 6% 33% 40% 18% 3% - -
56 WANG Andrew 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
57 ZHENG zhe 7% 28% 37% 22% 5% - -
58 PIESNER Zachary C. 5% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
59 KIM Ryan Y. 2% 22% 42% 26% 6% 1% -
60 HSIUNG Richie - 2% 15% 34% 34% 14% 2%
61 LE Jacob W. 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
62 PATINO Yahir 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% -
63 LLIDO Soren 17% 43% 30% 9% 1% - -
64 NGUYEN Liam 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
65 FARQUHARSON Cole - 1% 11% 30% 36% 18% 3%
65 DETERING Julian 2% 22% 39% 27% 8% 1% -
67 KIM Derek A. 2% 23% 40% 26% 8% 1% -
68 KIM Banseok J. 10% 43% 35% 11% 1% -
69 BARTEL Jacob L. 1% 10% 33% 37% 16% 3%
70 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 1% 10% 32% 38% 17% 3% -
71 HUANG Kevin D. 1% 28% 42% 23% 6% 1% -
72 BAEK David 1% 13% 39% 33% 12% 2% -
73 GOBBO Alexander 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
74 LIEBERMAN Grant 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
75 OH Jaden 37% 43% 16% 3% - - -
76 MCCOSH Evin M. 11% 41% 35% 12% 2% -
77 JEFFERY Jakob 50% 39% 10% 1% - -
78 LI Avery Peihong 20% 43% 28% 7% 1% -
79 LIM Charles Q. 21% 49% 26% 5% - -
80 LI Ryan Z. 7% 34% 39% 16% 3% - -
81 AVRON Case B. 2% 17% 37% 31% 11% 2% -
82 DORMAN Patrick 73% 24% 3% - - - -
83 RAINS Jackson T. 80% 18% 1% - - - -
84 BERK Theodore 12% 34% 34% 16% 3% -
85 PIALLING Mikhail 91% 8% - - - - -
86 PARK Gabriel 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
87 WOMACH Tristan 28% 44% 22% 5% - -
88 GUO Hairuo 44% 43% 12% 1% - -
89 CHUANG Kian J. 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
90 HARRIS Rhonen 63% 32% 5% - - -
91 GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. 5% 44% 38% 12% 2% - -
92 QIU Jay (Tengjie) 67% 29% 4% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.