Myrtle Beach Convention Center, Hall A - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | SAGE Michael P. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | WONG Garrick G. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | LOVE Aaron | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 5 | LEE Lukas | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 6 | MOHAMED Murad | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | EMENHEISER Conrad | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | D V V V D V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | ROSE Ben | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | LI Matthew | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 12 | MOHAMED Amir | V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | TIYA BIAYA K. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 14 | JITTAN daniel | V D V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | WECHSLER Jacob | D D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | TIKHAEV Alexander | V V V D D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 17 | SICHITIU Alexander | V V V V D V | D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 18 | PAN Henry | V V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 19 | KLYCZEK Andrew | D D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | ORLOV Dmitriy | V D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | KIM Donghyeok | V V V D V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 22 | DRESSEL Jet | V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | LEE Jacob | D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 24 | HUANG Eythan | D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | ZOU Yuming | V D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 26 | TANG August L. | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 27 | WANG Winston | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | FELIX Ian | V D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 29 | WANG Brayden | V V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 30 | SLOUGH Sean | D D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 31 | SONG Austin | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 32 | BERNABE Rafael | V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 33 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | BATRA Dev | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 35 | FU Steven | V D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 36 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 37 | MOE Annan | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 38 | EDWARDS Graham | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 39 | HAUSCHILD Carson | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 40 | BRUNO Caleb | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 41 | ODEA Ryan | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 42 | JONES Jackson | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 42 | YUAN Austin | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 44 | DEMIR Omer | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 45 | KIM Chaevin | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 46 | VENZON Gavin | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 47 | CHEN Zixuan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 48 | MILLER Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 49 | RILEY Colin T. | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 50 | GUPTILL Grady | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 51 | GADIYARAM Madhav | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.