Myrtle Beach Convention Center, Hall A - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MORAIS Paulo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | |
| 3 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 5 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 5% | |
| 6 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 3% |
| 7 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 8 | YIM Alex | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 10 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 11 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% |
| 12 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 13 | WANG Winston | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 14 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 15 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% |
| 18 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
| 19 | JITTAN daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 3% |
| 20 | SONG Austin | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 22 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 23 | SHEPHERD Conner M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 24 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 27 | PAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 28 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 96% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | BATRA Dev | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | 100% | 70% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | KIM Chaemin | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | FELIX Ian | 100% | 97% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 36 | SAGE Michael P. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 37 | FU Steven | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | GUEVARRA Gabriel (Gabe) W. | 100% | 91% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | YUAN Austin | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.