San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 72% |
2 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
3 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
3 | MA Andrew | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
5 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
6 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
7 | WANG Ethan | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
8 | DETERING Julian | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
9 | KHER Roan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
10 | MA Bryant | 4% | 38% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
11 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
12 | SISINNI Riccardo | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
13 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
14 | CHOI Ethan | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
15 | FANG Jaden | 6% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | AGRAWAL Niki | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
17 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
18 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
19 | LO Preston | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | EDISON Ansel | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
21 | KIM Benjamin | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.