San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 2 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 3 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 3 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 5 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 6 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 7 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 8 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
| 9 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | MA Bryant | 100% | 96% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 11 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 13 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 94% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 19 | LO Preston | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 20 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 21 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.