Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MECHKOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | |
| 2 | YU Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 3 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 3 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 5 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
| 6 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% | 30% | 5% | |
| 7 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 13% | |
| 8 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | KORSCHUN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
| 10 | MELCHER Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
| 11 | MCDERMOTT James E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | 2% | |
| 12 | PAPAVASSILIOU Christos | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 13 | HAN Dongcheng | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
| 14 | QUINLAN Sean | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | EGAN Edward L. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 2% | |
| 17 | DEPOMMIER Remi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | IORIO Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 20 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 21 | EDMONDS-ESTES Casey | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | BUTTS Brendan | 100% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 23 | HU Jansen T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 1% | |
| 24 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | MATEI Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 29 | REINEKE Gerhard | 100% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | ROUSE Brian G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 31 | ZOU Xianyang | 100% | 80% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | ADAMIAN David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 33 | IORIO Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 34 | QI Terry | 100% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | REINEKE Alexander | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | MILGRAM Aaron | 100% | 95% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | LIU Jeremiah | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | SEOL Austin | 100% | 88% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | CHU Wenxi | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.