San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WENDLER Alexander J. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 2 | WOO Christian | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 3 | JORDON Kaleb W. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 23% | |
| 3 | BAEK David | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 5 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 6 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 7 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 8 | MA Bryant | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | YEE Johnathan | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% |
| 10 | WU Conrad J. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 12 | PATINO Yahir | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 13 | ANDERSON Jacob | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 14 | MYERS Dean | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | BOUCHARD Kai | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | CHEN Justin K. | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | MA Andrew | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 18 | KHER Roan | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 19 | LIM Charles Q. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 20 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | WU Lucas | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | HARRIS Otto | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | WANG Ethan | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 24 | CHUANG Kian J. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 25 | RUBIN Max | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 26 | EDISON Ansel | 34% | 49% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 27 | TUAN Evan | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | CHENG Jonathan | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 30 | SEO Shawn | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | BARTELS Milo | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | AGRAWAL Niki | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LI Jett | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | LIU William | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | DORMAN Patrick | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LAM Nicolas | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | SMITH Grant D. | 5% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | MAK Osman K. | 8% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | PETERSON Lucas | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | CHRISTIE William | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 41 | ONG William | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 42 | NGUYEN Paolo | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BACHER Richard | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | PORTER Rory | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 39% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | HOHN dana | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.