San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WENDLER Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 2 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 3 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | |
| 3 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 5 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 6 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 7 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 8 | MA Bryant | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 10 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 12 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
| 13 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 14 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 17 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 18 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 19 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 20 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 21 | WU Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 24 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 25 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 30 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | BARTELS Milo | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | LIU William | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | DORMAN Patrick | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 95% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 92% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | CHRISTIE William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | ONG William | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | NGUYEN Paolo | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BACHER Richard | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | PORTER Rory | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | HOHN dana | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.