San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
2 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
3 | ZHANG Aaron | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
3 | MORROW Brenden | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 21% |
5 | NGUYEN martin | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
6 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
7 | LO Preston | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 38% | 5% | |
8 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% | |
9 | TSAY Jordan R. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 21% | |
10 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
11 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
12 | CHOI Ethan | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
13 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
14 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
15 | UHLIG Cole | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
16 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
17 | LING Eddie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 58% | 30% | |
18 | CHUN Dashel | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
19 | YUE Jackson | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
20 | WONG Evan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% | |
21 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 21% | |
22 | SHEN Oliver | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
23 | YI William | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
24 | BORG Matthew | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% | |
25 | ZHANG Graham | - | 6% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 3% | |
26 | NGAI Julian | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
27 | GORDON William L. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 1% | |
28 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | WU Thomas | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
30 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
31 | LE Jacob | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | CHAN Joseph | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
33 | YANG Charles | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
34 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 1% |
35 | HE Bourne | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | - | |
36 | CHANG Jonathan | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - |
37 | ZHOU Ryan | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
38 | LI Richard | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
39 | BIELER Mason | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
40 | SONG Matthew | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
41 | DANIEL Nikith | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | TULYAG Azim | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
43 | WANG rainier | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
44 | DULAI Angad | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
45 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
46 | PORPORA Oliver | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 11% | |
46 | FUKUDA Brando | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 7% | |
48 | ARCARA Evan | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
49 | SISINNI Leonardo | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
50 | YU ShiYu H. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
51 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
52 | ZHONG Maxwell | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
53 | METIN Atlas | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
54 | DENG David | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
55 | MORROW Sean | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
56 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
57 | YU ShiLin H. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
58 | PARK Roy | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
59 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
60 | PARK Rion | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
61 | CHEN David | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
62 | UPENDER West | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
63 | DULAI Agam | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
64 | LEHTINEN Axel | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
65 | HOM Logan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
66 | ZHANG Max | 6% | 30% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
67 | PARK William | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
68 | JEONG Taewoo | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
69 | ANDRADE Cedric | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
70 | CHEN Andrew | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
71 | HE Ian | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
72 | LIM Zachary | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
73 | CZYZEWSKI Oliver | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
74 | HUANG Nathan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
75 | LIANG Ethan | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | BANUELOS Dario | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
77 | ROSEN Benjamin | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
78 | PETROV Mikhail | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
79 | KARPMAN Benny | 26% | 44% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
79 | FOY Grant | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
81 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | 6% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
82 | GONZALEZ Mark | 2% | 21% | 46% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.