San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | NICOLETTI Luca | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
2 | FUKUDA Diego | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | MORROW Brenden | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
5 | NGUYEN martin | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
6 | WU Alber Y. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | LO Preston | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
8 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
9 | TSAY Jordan R. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
10 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
11 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
12 | CHOI Ethan | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
13 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
14 | DERRICK Blake | V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
15 | UHLIG Cole | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | KIM Daniel Y. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
17 | LING Eddie | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
18 | CHUN Dashel | V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
19 | YUE Jackson | V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
20 | WONG Evan | V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
21 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
22 | SHEN Oliver | V D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
23 | YI William | V D D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
24 | BORG Matthew | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
25 | ZHANG Graham | D V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
26 | NGAI Julian | D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
27 | GORDON William L. | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
28 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
29 | WU Thomas | V V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
30 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
31 | LE Jacob | V D D D D V | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
32 | CHAN Joseph | V D D V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
33 | YANG Charles | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
34 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | V V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
35 | HE Bourne | V D V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
36 | CHANG Jonathan | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
37 | ZHOU Ryan | V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
38 | LI Richard | V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
39 | BIELER Mason | D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
40 | SONG Matthew | V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
41 | DANIEL Nikith | D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
42 | TULYAG Azim | D D V V D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
43 | WANG rainier | D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
44 | DULAI Angad | D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
45 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
46 | PORPORA Oliver | D V V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
46 | FUKUDA Brando | D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
48 | ARCARA Evan | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
49 | SISINNI Leonardo | D V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
50 | YU ShiYu H. | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
51 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
52 | ZHONG Maxwell | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
53 | METIN Atlas | D D D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
54 | DENG David | D V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
55 | MORROW Sean | D V D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
56 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | D D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
57 | YU ShiLin H. | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
58 | PARK Roy | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
59 | MANIKTALA Suvir | D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
60 | PARK Rion | V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
61 | CHEN David | D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
62 | UPENDER West | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
63 | DULAI Agam | D D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
64 | LEHTINEN Axel | D D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
65 | HOM Logan | D D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
66 | ZHANG Max | D V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
67 | PARK William | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
68 | JEONG Taewoo | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
69 | ANDRADE Cedric | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
70 | CHEN Andrew | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
71 | HE Ian | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
72 | LIM Zachary | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
73 | CZYZEWSKI Oliver | D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
74 | HUANG Nathan | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
75 | LIANG Ethan | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
76 | BANUELOS Dario | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
77 | ROSEN Benjamin | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
78 | PETROV Mikhail | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
79 | KARPMAN Benny | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
79 | FOY Grant | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
81 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
82 | GONZALEZ Mark | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.