PTBA Basketball Association - La Puente, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 2 | SOTO Ulises G | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% | |
| 3 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 48% | 39% |
| 3 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 34% | 59% |
| 5 | KIM Derek A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 6 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 7 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 8 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | SIU Aiden | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% | |
| 10 | MCCOSH Evin M. | - | 1% | 15% | 50% | 29% | 5% | |
| 11 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 12 | GOLDADE Luke A. | - | - | 11% | 41% | 41% | 6% | |
| 13 | GOBBO Alexander | - | - | 1% | 17% | 50% | 32% | |
| 14 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
| 15 | LLIDO Soren | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | TEH Ryan | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 49% | 34% |
| 18 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% |
| 19 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 20 | PARK Gabriel | 3% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | MO Jason | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 22 | JORDON Kaleb W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 9% |
| 23 | WU Lucas | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 24 | VARGAS Bryan | - | - | 1% | 16% | 47% | 35% | |
| 25 | PIESNER Zachary C. | - | - | 24% | 48% | 25% | 2% | |
| 25 | SISINNI Riccardo | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 46% | 23% | |
| 27 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | NGUYEN Liam | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | OH Jaden | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | REDDINGTON aidan | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
| 33 | ZHENG zhe | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
| 34 | MYERS Dean | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHENG Jonathan | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 37 | NGUYEN William | 13% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SMITH Grant D. | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | YEE Johnathan | - | 1% | 36% | 46% | 16% | 1% | |
| 40 | ELVANDER Ethan | 2% | 24% | 53% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | KIM Aiden | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 42 | LI Avery Peihong | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 13% | |
| 43 | KETTELLE John | 7% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | PARK Sky | 7% | 32% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | HARRIS Rhonen | 1% | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | NAM Michael | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 47 | BLAM Matthew | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | AGRAWAL Niki | 8% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | BARTSCH Henry | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | PETERSON Lucas | 14% | 55% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | PORTER Rory | 54% | 44% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | LIU William | 6% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | LEE Dylan | - | 6% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 54 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 20% | 46% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ALBINALI Eissa | 59% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | KRAUSE Colin | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | COUFAL Christian | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | RUBIN Max | 6% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | BEECHER Keegan | 42% | 56% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | NA Larry | 15% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | DALVA Michael | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | OPATKIEWICZ Aidan | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 63 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 64 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.