Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACZIK Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 2 | RANES Evan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 3 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 3 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 22% | |
| 5 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 6 | CRANOR Erich L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
| 7 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 8 | FRANK Fred | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | |
| 9 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 10 | WAY Kashi M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 11% | |
| 11 | GOOSSENS Bruno | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 12 | NEWSOME James L. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | BRAND Wesley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 14 | TEITENBERG John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% |
| 15 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 16 | SEAMAN C. Scott (Scott) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 17 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | MARSHALL Wesley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 19 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 20 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 21 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | |
| 22 | PIERRO Roger | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 23 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 24 | WRIGHT Andrew M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 25 | HESS Marc F. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | STOCK Jordan | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 80% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | CLARK Timothy J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 29 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | EDWARDS Tim | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HARRELL D. Fox | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 34 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 35 | RYAN Christopher | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | SKOPIK Jr August | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | SAYLOR David A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 8% | |
| 40 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | PARY Theodore | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | ALLEN Melvin | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | SCHWARY Irv | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | CROUCH William John (John) | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 45 | MIKULSKI Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 46 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | OCHS Bradley C. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 48 | SPAHN Jeff | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 49 | VAUGHN David | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | STEINWACHS Mark | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | NOLAN Hartwell (Ed) (Ed) E. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | HARTIGAN Joe | 100% | 84% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | CHEN Steve | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | MANOUKIAN David | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.