Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WATRALL Rick | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
| 2 | RICHARDS Dick | - | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 3 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 3 | JENSEN David | - | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 5 | MARIANI Lou | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 6 | RANES Evan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 7 | VARNEY John R. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 8 | GLASS Timothy C. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
| 9 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 10 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 45% | 19% |
| 11 | BAXTER Daniel J. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 12 | WHEELER Mark C. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 13 | EVANS Allen L. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 14 | NIXON Mark | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 15 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 16 | KLEIN Johannes | 7% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | - | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | HAGEN Christopher (Chris) L. | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | - | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 20 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 21 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 22 | SCOTT George R. | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 23 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 24 | SWANN William A. | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 26 | MASE James B. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 27 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 29 | SWANSON Dave | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 30 | HENZLER Thomas A. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 31 | WAGMAN Robert S. | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 33 | KRUGER Mark | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | ALEXANDER Chuck | - | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 35 | VAN DER WEGE Gary M. | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 25% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | STONE Ken | 56% | 40% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | TIERNEY Luke | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | GROSS Louis A. | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | MELCHER Charles | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | JORGENSEN Jay | 56% | 40% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | MYERS Brent M. | 27% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | MITCHELL Matthew D. | 32% | 58% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.