Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WATRALL Rick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 2 | RICHARDS Dick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 3 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% |
| 3 | JENSEN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 5 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 6 | RANES Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 7 | VARNEY John R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 8 | GLASS Timothy C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 9 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 10 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 19% |
| 11 | BAXTER Daniel J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 12 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 14 | NIXON Mark | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 15 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 16 | KLEIN Johannes | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | HAGEN Christopher (Chris) L. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 20 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 21 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | |
| 22 | SCOTT George R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | |
| 23 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 24 | SWANN William A. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | SZOKOLAY Robert E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 26 | MASE James B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 27 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 30 | HENZLER Thomas A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 31 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 32 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 33 | KRUGER Mark | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | ALEXANDER Chuck | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 35 | VAN DER WEGE Gary M. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | POPOVICI Alexander M. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 100% | 75% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | STONE Ken | 100% | 44% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 72% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | GROSS Louis A. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | MELCHER Charles | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | JORGENSEN Jay | 100% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | MYERS Brent M. | 100% | 73% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | MITCHELL Matthew D. | 100% | 68% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.