Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
| 2 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 3 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 3 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 34% | |
| 5 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 6 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
| 7 | MICHAELSEN Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 8 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | ||
| 9 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
| 10 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 98% | 76% | 33% | 5% | ||
| 11 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 12 | TOLBERT Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 13 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 14 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | 3% | |
| 15 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 16 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 3% |
| 17 | LIU Siyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% |
| 18 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% |
| 19 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 43% |
| 20 | STRUGAR Steliana | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 21 | ZHUANG Christina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | LAMBERT Mahala | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% |
| 23 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% |
| 24 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 25 | YIN Helen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 26 | KO Claire | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | JIANG Yangying (Amanda) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 28 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
| 30 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 20% | |
| 31 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 32 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 35 | DO Leila | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 36 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | |
| 37 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 38 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 39 | BOLES Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% |
| 40 | FELLMAN Sara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 20% |
| 42 | YANICELLI Sloane | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 44 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | SUN Emily | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 46 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 46 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 48 | KETTELLE Molly | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 49 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 50 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 6% | |
| 51 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 52 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 53 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 3% |
| 54 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 55 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | 9% |
| 56 | WEI Angela | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 57 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 58 | POWERS Meredith R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 59 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 60 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 61 | HAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 62 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 63 | LIN Ju-An Adrianne | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 64 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 95% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | UNGERER Frieda | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 67 | COKER Bettina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
| 68 | SUH Kailey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 69 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 89% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 71 | MI Anning | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 72 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 27% | |
| 73 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 74 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 75 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 76 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 77 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | ||
| 78 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 79 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 79 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 81 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 82 | PARK Leah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 83 | LONG Madeline M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 84 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 71% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 85 | DEMOSS Mercedes | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 86 | NUNLEY Victoria | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 87 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 88 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 89 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 90 | KUNDU TRISHA | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 91 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 92 | MCLAURIN Semini | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | ZHAO Aimee | 100% | 64% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 94 | NEWMAN Ariel | 100% | 99% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 95 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 95% | 64% | 22% | 3% | ||
| 96 | HERNANDEZ Melany | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 97 | ROLOFF Katarina M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 98 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 99 | FULIGNI Isabella | 100% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 100 | SETHRE Traci | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 101 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 102 | NIRGUDE Siddhi | 100% | 86% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | STONE Colleen R. | 100% | 84% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 105 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 105 | TOMASI Samantha | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | BRUSH Sydney | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 108 | SULTER Aurelie | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 109 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | ||
| 110 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 111 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 90% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 112 | SHELARE Mehal | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 113 | MADSEN Lindsey | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 114 | GREENLEAF Ella | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 115 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 115 | DONDERIS Katherine | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 117 | BURTON Sequoia | 100% | 89% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | NORTH Zoe M. | 100% | 65% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 118 | CRANFILL Madison | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 120 | OWINGS Anna | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | BROCE Lilianna | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 120 | HOLCOMB Emily | 100% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 123 | KLINE Rachel | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.