Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 2 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 3 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
| 3 | SPURLIN Alicen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 5 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
| 6 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 7 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 8 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 9 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 10 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 11 | FLANIGAN KENDRA | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 12 | POON Desiree | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 13 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | BREKSA Lydia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | GROSSL Karina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 8% | |
| 17 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 18 | ENGLISH Marli | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 19 | BHATT Anisha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
| 22 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
| 23 | FREEMAN Kate | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | JACKSON Viktoria | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | HALM Alexandra F. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | YOU Joyce | 100% | 85% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | TONG Lauren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 29 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | HAYDEN Molly | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 32 | SEUK Irene | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | DOERR Zoe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 35 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 36 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 37 | PEARSON Heila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 38 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 39 | BOLES Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 40 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
| 41 | WIDMANN Ceili | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 42 | PARKS Eliana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 43 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | GULLY Wren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | BURN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 46 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | MEWES Katie M. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | DRYSDALE Lita | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 49 | DONGES Anna | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 50 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 51 | COURTNEY Elya Rebekah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 52 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 53 | MOHAMED Faisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 54 | FORDER Isabel | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 56 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 57 | ARAYE Nasro | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 58 | ALDORT Isabel | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 59 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 60 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | MORIN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 62 | ZOU Jiayi-Hannah | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | FRAGER Soleil | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | MANAUGH Calliope | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 65 | LIU Lucy | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 66 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% | |
| 67 | NELSON Gwendolyn H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 68 | JARUSHI Amnee | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 70 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 71 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 72 | XU Priscilla | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | DONDISCH Andrea | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 74 | NWOKOCHA Chizoro | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 75 | PYE Emily | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 76 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% |
| 77 | HAWKINS Katie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 78 | LOFTIS Hunter | 100% | 81% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | GUSKA Jenn | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 81 | KIM Emily | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 82 | CARLSON Ava | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 83 | JHANGIANI KAVYA | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 84 | MAY Courtney | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 85 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.