University of Maryland, College Park Campus - Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Aidan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 2 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 3 | LIN Michael | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 3 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 5 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% |
| 6 | LE Vyn A. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 7 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 8 | SHI Shenzhi | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 9 | MOHAMED Murad | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 41% | 7% |
| 10 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
| 11 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 12 | GAO William | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 13 | MOHAMED Amir | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 14 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 15 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 16 | WANG Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 17 | SONG Austin | 4% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 18 | LIU Eric Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 19 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 20 | HUANG Eythan | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LI Matthew | - | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 22 | YAP Nathan | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | DRESSEL Jet | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | PAN Henry | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | TIKHAEV Alexander | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 26 | LAUSI Patrick M. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | MATSAKH Philip | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | EVANS Aidan | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 29 | WANG Brayden | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 31 | DUSZA Zachery | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | WANG Winston | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | |
| 35 | MOREY Zachary D. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ALONSOZANA Luke | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | MULLIGAN Timothy (Tim) D. | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 38 | SHEARMAN Mathew | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 39 | ROGERS Windell | 45% | 47% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | TOMASI John | 40% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | ALAMI Faisal | 13% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | HEETER Alex | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | NSUBUGA Jeffrey | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | ANDERSON Donald | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.