Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAURER Ned E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 2 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 3 | HEALY Griffen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 3 | MA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | |
| 5 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 6 | MANGE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 20% |
| 7 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 8 | FERRARO Peter M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 9 | GAEHDE Christian P. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 10 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 11 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos G. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 12 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 13 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 14 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
| 15 | ASCIONED'ELIA Adam I. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 2% | |
| 16 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 17 | KAZA Nitish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 18% |
| 18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | 2% | |
| 19 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% | |
| 20 | MEYERS Lee P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | OZSOLAK Alex | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | BRYANT Max | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | AMRANI David | 100% | 97% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 25 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | CARMAN Ian K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
| 27 | TSIMBINOS Thomas R. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - | |
| 29 | XIE Javah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 98% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | KIZHNER Fillip | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | ENGEL Henry R. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | CUSICK Matthew K. | 100% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | TOMRUK Batu | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.