Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ALVIOR Joshua B. | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
2 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
3 | FULLERTON Houston T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
3 | KIM Derek D. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
5 | LEONE III Charles D. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
6 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
7 | KENYON Jacob | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
8 | DANZIG Jacob S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
9 | SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
10 | JACKSON James | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
11 | LEE Kennith | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
12 | BLAND Ian A. | V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
13 | VALES Keyan | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
14 | LIM Joshua | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | CHEN Gabriel | V D D V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
16 | SCALES Chad | D V D V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
17 | TIYA Biaya K. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
19 | MALLOY Patrick G. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
20 | NGUYEN Audrey | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
21 | ZHOU Alec Q. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
22 | CRANE Matthew T. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
23 | LIU Eric | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
24 | LANGE Eric A. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
25 | NORMAN Christian | V V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
26 | ARIAS Troy A. | V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
27 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | V V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
28 | WEISSMAN Kai | V D V D V | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
29 | LABROZZI Aidan | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
30 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
31 | WANG Aidan | D D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
32 | SCHARF Ryan | D D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
33 | CHAMBERS Matthew | V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
34 | LEWIS Jared | V V V V V V | D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
35 | CHO Tyler H. | V V V V V D | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
36 | ALLEY Everett | V V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
37 | ARUN Vikhyat | V V V V D V | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
38 | CORLEY Avery | V V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
39 | EVANS Grant | D V V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
40 | ARMISTEAD Jack Riley | V V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
41 | MODULLA Yathin | V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
42 | HAN David | D V V D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
43 | GUDAPATI Rahul | D V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
44 | DULISSE ALeX | D V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
45 | DIVERIS Joseph | D V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
46 | WANG Bryan | V V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
47 | SARIKONDA Akhil | V D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
48 | LENAHAN Conor J. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
49 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | D V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
50 | NAIK Saininad | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
51 | ZHANG Eric | D V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
52 | FONG Erik | V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
53 | BASKIN Miles | V V V D D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
54 | WEBB Jacob T. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
55 | RAY William | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
56 | DECKER Carlton | D V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
57 | YANG Alan H. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
58 | WOLFE Alex | D D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
59 | WOLF Christopher | D V D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
60 | SU Rui | D D V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
61 | TAM Ethan | V D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
62 | PATIL Amulya | V D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
63 | SAYLOR David A. | D V D D V D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
64 | APLIN Canyon | D D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
65 | SNYDER Ari | D D V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
67 | PARK Judy | V V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
68 | MEYERS Jory B. | V D D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
69 | FORSYTHE Hunter | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
70 | RUSCONI Jane | D V D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
70 | AWAN Saqlain A. | D V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
70 | LE Kevin | D D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
73 | THOMPSON Daniel M M. | V D V D D V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
74 | WALKER Cory S. | D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
75 | NG Joshua Z. | V D V V D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
76 | TILAKA Michael | D V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
76 | ENGLISH Marli | D V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
78 | HAWKINS Sophia | D V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
79 | WEBSTER Davis G. | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
80 | PAK Joel | D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
81 | CHRONISTER Charles | V V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
82 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | V D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
83 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | V D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
84 | ATON Dave | D D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
85 | BERNSTEIN Matt B. | V D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
86 | GEISSLER Maximilian | D D D V V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
87 | LIN Kason | D V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
88 | BIRT David (Dave) L. | D V D D D V | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
88 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | D V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
90 | KRIEGER Jack | V D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
90 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
92 | FREEMAN Zachary | D D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
93 | DEMAREE Adam | V D D V D D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
94 | MISKELL William | V V D D D D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 | |
95 | FULLERTON Joshua D. | V D D D V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 | |
96 | PIETILA Matthew | D V D D D V | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 | |
97 | VAUGHN David | D D V D V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 | |
98 | HAN Ethan | V D D D | 1.0 | 1 | - | |
99 | LIU Dylan Y. | D V D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
100 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | D V D D D D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 | |
101 | CHANG Shane | V D D D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
102 | ARNOLD Benjamin | D D D D V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 | |
103 | SOTTILE Cole | D D D D D V | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
104 | WILLIAMS Eli | D D D D D V | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
105 | LEE Daehyeon | D V D D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
106 | LEVERETT-HALL Corrina | V D D D D D | 1.0 | 1 | - | |
107 | KEMLE Brian | D V D D D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
108 | BENITEZ Abner | D D V D D D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 | |
108 | JUNG Elliot | V D D D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
110 | HALL Leandra M. | D V D D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
111 | JOHNSON Soren | D V D D D D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 | |
112 | JACKSON Viktoria | V D D D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
112 | ROBINSON Blake | D D D V D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
112 | CULLEN Reilly | D D D D V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 | |
115 | MIHILL Margaret | D D D D V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
116 | HARTIG Larisa | V D D D D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
117 | WILFORD Madigan | D D D D D V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
118 | ORTHOUS Lucas | D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
119 | DILLARD Katlyn M. | D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
120 | SANDERS Charlotte | D D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
120 | MCCREARY Madeleine | D D D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
122 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | D D D D D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 | |
122 | KOKA Ashwin | D D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
122 | LIU Kevin | D D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
122 | ECKARD Melody | D D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
126 | ALVARENGA Darby | D D D D D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 | |
126 | LIN Samantha | D D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
128 | LIU Nick | D D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
128 | RILEY Grace | D D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
128 | ILENRE Roni | D D D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.