Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ALVIOR Joshua B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 2 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 3 | FULLERTON Houston T. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 3 | KIM Derek D. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 5 | LEONE III Charles D. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 6 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 10% |
| 7 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
| 8 | DANZIG Jacob S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 9 | SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 10 | JACKSON James | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 11 | LEE Kennith | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 2% | |
| 12 | BLAND Ian A. | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 41% | ||
| 13 | VALES Keyan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 14 | LIM Joshua | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 15 | CHEN Gabriel | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 9% |
| 16 | SCALES Chad | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | TIYA Biaya K. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 18 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
| 19 | MALLOY Patrick G. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 20 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | ZHOU Alec Q. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 22 | CRANE Matthew T. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 23 | LIU Eric | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 24 | LANGE Eric A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 25 | NORMAN Christian | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
| 26 | ARIAS Troy A. | - | 3% | 23% | 52% | 22% | ||
| 27 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 28 | WEISSMAN Kai | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% | |
| 29 | LABROZZI Aidan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% |
| 30 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 31 | WANG Aidan | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 32 | SCHARF Ryan | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | CHAMBERS Matthew | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% | |
| 34 | LEWIS Jared | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 35 | CHO Tyler H. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 36 | ALLEY Everett | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | ARUN Vikhyat | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 38 | CORLEY Avery | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 39 | EVANS Grant | - | - | 2% | 21% | 46% | 27% | 3% |
| 40 | ARMISTEAD Jack Riley | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 3% |
| 41 | MODULLA Yathin | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 42 | HAN David | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | GUDAPATI Rahul | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | DULISSE ALeX | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | DIVERIS Joseph | - | 2% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 46 | WANG Bryan | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | SARIKONDA Akhil | - | 9% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | LENAHAN Conor J. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 49 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 50 | NAIK Saininad | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 5% |
| 51 | ZHANG Eric | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | FONG Erik | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% | |
| 53 | BASKIN Miles | - | - | 2% | 21% | 44% | 28% | 4% |
| 54 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 55 | RAY William | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 56 | DECKER Carlton | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 57 | YANG Alan H. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 58 | WOLFE Alex | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 59 | WOLF Christopher | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | SU Rui | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 61 | TAM Ethan | - | 9% | 47% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | PATIL Amulya | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 63 | SAYLOR David A. | - | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 64 | APLIN Canyon | - | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | SNYDER Ari | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 67 | PARK Judy | 2% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 68 | MEYERS Jory B. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | FORSYTHE Hunter | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 70 | RUSCONI Jane | 1% | 16% | 56% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | AWAN Saqlain A. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 70 | LE Kevin | 1% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 73 | THOMPSON Daniel M M. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 74 | WALKER Cory S. | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 75 | NG Joshua Z. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 10% |
| 76 | TILAKA Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 76 | ENGLISH Marli | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 78 | HAWKINS Sophia | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 79 | WEBSTER Davis G. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 80 | PAK Joel | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 81 | CHRONISTER Charles | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 82 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | - | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 83 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 84 | ATON Dave | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 85 | BERNSTEIN Matt B. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 86 | GEISSLER Maximilian | 30% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 87 | LIN Kason | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | BIRT David (Dave) L. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 5% |
| 88 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 90 | KRIEGER Jack | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 92 | FREEMAN Zachary | 16% | 53% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 93 | DEMAREE Adam | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 94 | MISKELL William | - | 6% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 95 | FULLERTON Joshua D. | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 96 | PIETILA Matthew | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | VAUGHN David | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 98 | HAN Ethan | 28% | 47% | 23% | 2% | - | ||
| 99 | LIU Dylan Y. | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 100 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 101 | CHANG Shane | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 102 | ARNOLD Benjamin | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 103 | SOTTILE Cole | 3% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 104 | WILLIAMS Eli | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 105 | LEE Daehyeon | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 106 | LEVERETT-HALL Corrina | 24% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 107 | KEMLE Brian | 5% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 108 | BENITEZ Abner | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 108 | JUNG Elliot | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 110 | HALL Leandra M. | 20% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 111 | JOHNSON Soren | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 112 | JACKSON Viktoria | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | ROBINSON Blake | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | CULLEN Reilly | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 115 | MIHILL Margaret | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 116 | HARTIG Larisa | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 117 | WILFORD Madigan | 35% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 118 | ORTHOUS Lucas | 22% | 49% | 26% | 3% | - | ||
| 119 | DILLARD Katlyn M. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 120 | SANDERS Charlotte | 6% | 41% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 120 | MCCREARY Madeleine | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 122 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 10% | - | |
| 122 | KOKA Ashwin | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 122 | LIU Kevin | 12% | 45% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | ECKARD Melody | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 126 | ALVARENGA Darby | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 126 | LIN Samantha | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 128 | LIU Nick | 51% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 128 | RILEY Grace | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 128 | ILENRE Roni | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.