Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SMITH Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 2 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% |
| 3 | MILLER Jeffrey E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 3 | LI Patrick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 5 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 6 | BOYCE Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 11% |
| 7 | WALL Peter M. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 8 | KILUK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 36% | |
| 10 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 14% |
| 13 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 36% | |
| 14 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 15 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
| 17 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 20 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% | 8% |
| 22 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% | |
| 23 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% | |
| 24 | THORESON Gary C. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | SARKAR agniv | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 26 | MAITLAND Benjamin | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | MING Nathan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 31 | FU Leon | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 8% | - | |
| 32 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 34 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 100% | 87% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SALZER Scott | 100% | 81% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | NAVIK Roy | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.