Strength Ranking

Men's Sabre, Birth Year 2005

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Heathcock, Colin Yang Siqi 4078 3703 - A23
2 Silberzweig, Jordan 3838 3578 - A25
3 Lukashenko, Darii 3632 3369 7 A25
4 Linsky, Matthew 3626 3369 5 A23
5 Liang, Connor 3498 3229 - A23
6 Dhingra, Gian 3463 3205 25 A24
7 WU, Roger 3430 3166 32 A24
8 So, Hananiah 3298 3042 46 A24
9 Fernandez, Rodrigo 3243 2980 32 A22
10 Yang, Ziyi 3228 2970 3 B22
11 Berman, Luca 3197 2941 45 A24
12 Denner, Maximilian 3112 2852 18 A24
13 Chen, Oscar 3182 2831 - D24
14 Barreto, Elliott 3203 2831 - B24
15 Tann, Justin 3052 2794 - A21
16 Xu, William 3024 2769 2 B23
17 Noble, Colin 3018 2766 11 A23
18 Slastin, Andrew 3095 2764 41 A23
19 Rightler, Samuel 3034 2761 24 A23
20 Ginis, Nathan 3007 2727 - D23
21 Hong, Vincent 2972 2721 19 B22
22 Kotov, Leonid 2978 2716 22 A22
23 Bull, Anderson 2943 2684 2 B24
24 Margulies, William 2930 2677 - B24
25 ghayalod, ansh 2923 2663 11 B24
26 Chin, Matthew 2913 2652 12 A21
27 Kim-Cogan, Ryan 2910 2643 - B22
28 Cheong, Heonjae 2872 2612 16 B22
29 Wong, Ryan 2865 2605 1 B22
30 Ho, Kaden 2868 2604 - B22
31 Lindholm, Oliver 2863 2596 2 A23
32 Chaves, Matthew 2846 2588 4 A24
33 Kibbar, Tomer 2849 2566 23 D23
34 Erachshaw, Cyrus 2851 2544 14 C21
35 Houtz, Jackson 2785 2529 20 A22
36 Dolan, Charles 2777 2517 3 C24
37 Greenbaum, Ian 2750 2496 6 B23
38 Flot, Tai 2766 2480 5 B24
39 Han, Daniel 2724 2465 - C23
40 Schardine, James 2760 2455 32 B24
41 Yang, Duncan (BoTong) 2765 2411 33 D22
42 Lin, Nick 2755 2407 14 C24
43 Keefe, Duncan 2720 2399 - D23
44 Beitel, Noah 2612 2332 23 C23
45 Piwowar, Alex 2572 2320 8 B24
46 Rauscher, Ryan 2623 2293 52 C24
47 Khodir, Yassin 3728 2279 2279 U
48 Kushkov, Veniamin 2603 2275 - B23
49 Zhou, Aeres 2534 2236 - C23
50 DuPree, Thomas 2513 2210 41 C23
51 Scherer, Max 2481 2190 - C23
52 Caisse, Simon 2475 2182 5 D22
53 Cheng, Kyle 2500 2179 - D21
54 Bang, Hyeonjin 2880 2179 - U
55 Overdeck, Andrew 2467 2174 - D21
56 Fernandez, Liam 2758 2146 4 B23

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.