Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Joo, Jeein | 2903 | 2646 | 65 | A24 |
2 | KIM, ELIJAH | 2890 | 2633 | 6 | A24 |
3 | Mehan, Nicholas | 2885 | 2620 | 80 | B24 |
4 | Anthony, Devyn | 2870 | 2618 | 40 | A24 |
5 | Kang, Evan | 2873 | 2614 | 4 | B24 |
6 | Vaid, Luke | 2776 | 2522 | 103 | A24 |
7 | Ermakov, Semeon | 2768 | 2505 | 122 | A24 |
8 | Kim, Ethan | 2736 | 2479 | 26 | B23 |
9 | Lin, Maxim | 2719 | 2465 | 72 | B24 |
10 | chon, Collin | 2710 | 2454 | 49 | B24 |
11 | Pastore Liu, Vince | 2688 | 2433 | 108 | A24 |
12 | Patel, Rayn | 2688 | 2428 | 27 | B24 |
13 | Kim, Kendrick | 2651 | 2394 | 180 | B24 |
14 | Liu, Kevin | 2647 | 2393 | 62 | C24 |
15 | Skarbonkiewicz, Maksymilian | 2652 | 2390 | 64 | A24 |
16 | Munguia, Nathan | 2641 | 2387 | 25 | B24 |
17 | Zhao, Lucas | 2621 | 2368 | 65 | B24 |
18 | Wang, Daniel | 2617 | 2367 | 2 | A24 |
19 | Chung, Connor | 2605 | 2354 | 66 | B24 |
20 | WANG, ANDREW CHANG | 2707 | 2353 | 391 | C24 |
21 | Wang, Zhuoyi | 2567 | 2311 | 11 | B24 |
22 | Wang, Justin | 2559 | 2303 | 30 | C24 |
23 | Bonetti, Brayden | 2543 | 2289 | - | D23 |
24 | So, Preston | 2534 | 2277 | 24 | C24 |
25 | Gonzalez, Jake | 2506 | 2238 | 22 | C24 |
26 | Ngo, Maximus | 2499 | 2237 | 157 | B24 |
27 | Wang, Max | 2481 | 2207 | 340 | B24 |
28 | Bell, Alfred (Tripp) | 2433 | 2170 | 11 | C23 |
29 | Jin, Liangxuan | 3277 | 2143 | 2143 | U |
30 | gong, zihao | 2406 | 2137 | 103 | U |
31 | Nguyen, Anthony | 2383 | 2126 | 36 | C23 |
32 | Holz, Lucas | 2371 | 2121 | 118 | C24 |
33 | Cao, Oliver | 2378 | 2104 | 87 | E24 |
34 | Yap, Kah Kai (Cayden) | 2351 | 2096 | 58 | C24 |
35 | Alave, Kyle | 2350 | 2094 | 12 | E24 |
36 | Mattoo, Deven | 2357 | 2078 | 146 | C23 |
37 | Meyerson, Jacob | 2341 | 2074 | 64 | C24 |
38 | Gay, Jono | 2329 | 2058 | 86 | C24 |
39 | Hua, Michael | 2331 | 2037 | 18 | C24 |
40 | Wang, Yiyu Will | 2528 | 2028 | 213 | D24 |
41 | Lin, Philip | 2269 | 2016 | 79 | C24 |
42 | Sturgeon, Cole | 2291 | 2002 | 59 | E24 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.