Strength Ranking

Men's Sabre, Birth Year 2012

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chambers, Miles 2757 2493 47 B26
2 Khanna, Adamantis 2616 2350 50 C26
3 Luc, Cedric 2465 2206 34 B25
4 Greenstein, Viktor 2408 2155 20 B25
5 Lucas, William 2399 2149 112 B26
6 Grigoriev, Roman 2377 2117 32 D25
7 YU, BOWEN 2370 2116 5 C25
8 Kozlov, Lucas 2368 2113 49 D25
9 zeyu, wu 2450 2102 71 C25
10 Kang, Jeremy 2340 2084 32 C25
11 Agarwaal, Yohan 2260 2009 15 B25
12 Wong, Hawken 2219 1953 53 C25
13 Hwang, Hagan 2203 1951 76 D25
14 Beal, Colton 2200 1942 31 E25
15 Chang, Ethan 2196 1938 14 C25
16 Miao, Heqi 2185 1935 30 D25
17 Vo, Blake 2143 1877 95 D26
18 Song, Aidan 2112 1864 37 D25
19 Slavnov, Anton 2088 1838 54 D25
20 Grabowski, Alexander 2152 1835 - U
21 hu, hongyu (Hongyu) 2617 1821 - E26
22 Liang, Morgan 2088 1819 17 E25
23 Archibald, Zachary 2071 1803 37 E25
24 Briseno, Ethan 2096 1802 62 E25
25 Li, Michael 2101 1802 116 D25
26 Tang, Morgan 2047 1792 6 E25
27 D'Amelj, Edoardo 2025 1772 19 C25
28 Hao, Johnny 1991 1730 5 D26
29 Avery, Marcus 1974 1721 19 U
30 Lau, Kyrus 1965 1714 43 E25
31 Brooks, Theo 1980 1707 41 E26
32 Hristov, Nickolas 1962 1690 67 U
33 Wu, Vincent 1933 1679 10 D25
34 Biviji, Adam 1945 1675 50 U
35 ou, Rigel 1916 1650 36 E25
36 Takebe, Ren 1959 1642 41 U
37 Liu, Jayden 1881 1618 65 D26
38 Li, Ryan 1856 1603 57 U
39 Brady, Jack 1956 1596 89 U
40 Blair, Campbell 1943 1594 18 U
41 Hodes, Greg 2084 1556 57 U
42 Kim, Shiloh 1998 1554 30 U
43 Chou, Qianhao (Franklin) 1839 1553 43 U
44 Holmes, Xavier 1807 1545 31 D25
45 Zhang, Aiden 1840 1541 150 E26
46 Stolcke, Julian 1832 1538 35 E25
47 Titov, Zachary 1798 1533 9 U
48 abada, lucca 1862 1531 10 U
49 Kirkham, Walter 3365 1530 - U
50 Aluf, Brendon 1841 1526 11 U
51 Bennett, Lachlan 1817 1522 1 U
52 Guven, Derin 1843 1519 191 E25
53 Brooks, Drake 1770 1509 28 U
54 Chavan, Aditya 1766 1505 29 U
55 Fischer, Noel 1772 1503 63 U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.