| Rank | Name | Strength | Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* | 180-day Trend | Rating | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gebala, Gabrielle Grace | 3190 | 2900 | 3 | A25 | 
| 2 | Cho, Rebecca | 3038 | 2755 | 72 | A25 | 
| 3 | Luo, Ziyue | 3034 | 2745 | 72 | A24 | 
| 4 | Tan, Kaitlyn | 3021 | 2736 | 33 | A25 | 
| 5 | Lin, Zhi Tong | 2837 | 2574 | 10 | A25 | 
| 6 | Mi, Aileen | 2828 | 2563 | 39 | A25 | 
| 7 | Tavola, Alessandra | 3459 | 2554 | 2554 | B25 | 
| 8 | Chen, Chloe | 2817 | 2551 | 45 | A25 | 
| 9 | Xia, Youyang | 2952 | 2550 | 6 | U | 
| 10 | Orvananos, Anice | 2719 | 2461 | 32 | A25 | 
| 11 | Glasson, Sophia | 2817 | 2437 | - | A22 | 
| 12 | SEO, IRENE | 2687 | 2427 | 35 | A25 | 
| 13 | Leung, Mei Hang (Danise) | 2666 | 2397 | 6 | B24 | 
| 14 | Bryzgalova, Svitlana | 2697 | 2368 | - | C23 | 
| 15 | Rozpedowski, Claire | 2625 | 2355 | 14 | A25 | 
| 16 | Mu, Allison | 2582 | 2324 | 9 | B24 | 
| 17 | Sheng, Chuxi | 2565 | 2309 | 17 | A24 | 
| 18 | Chow, Annabelle | 2551 | 2294 | 102 | B25 | 
| 19 | Sun, Emily | 2557 | 2288 | 24 | B25 | 
| 20 | Yao, Ada | 2537 | 2283 | 1 | A24 | 
| 21 | Li, Sophia | 2534 | 2275 | 44 | A25 | 
| 22 | Liu, Angel(Daying) | 2496 | 2235 | 30 | B25 | 
| 23 | Xinyao, Zhou | 2698 | 2153 | 2153 | B25 | 
| 24 | Zheng, Julie | 2407 | 2151 | 63 | B24 | 
| 25 | Sha, Yi Ling | 2394 | 2139 | 34 | B25 | 
| 26 | Field, Julianna | 2369 | 2117 | 36 | B24 | 
| 27 | Li, Eleanor | 2362 | 2107 | 80 | B25 | 
| 28 | Zhang, Eunice | 2348 | 2091 | 44 | A24 | 
| 29 | Ko, Claire | 2334 | 2081 | 42 | A24 | 
| 30 | Matos, Lívia | 2352 | 2062 | - | D24 | 
| 31 | Biodrowicz, Julia | 2321 | 2062 | 47 | B24 | 
| 32 | Shmay, Anastasia | 2301 | 2047 | 32 | B24 | 
| 33 | Zhuang, Christina | 2301 | 2045 | - | A23 | 
| 34 | Castaneda, Keira | 2295 | 2039 | 24 | B25 | 
| 35 | Hu, Felice | 2291 | 2037 | - | A23 | 
| 36 | Chang, Elizabeth | 2288 | 2033 | - | B23 | 
| 37 | strugar, Steliana | 2291 | 2031 | 16 | B25 | 
| 38 | Sandoval, Margaux | 2902 | 2018 | - | E24 | 
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.