Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DIVITO Dylan | - | - | - | - | 8% | 38% | 53% |
| 2 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
| 3 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
| 3 | WOO Christian | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 31% | 5% |
| 5 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 6 | CHENG Nathan | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 11% | |
| 7 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 8 | DINSAY Kristjan | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 9 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 10 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 11 | CHENG Matthew S. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 12 | SIU Aiden | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
| 13 | WYMAN Julian | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 14 | VARGAS Bryan | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
| 15 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 16 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 17 | LI Avery Peihong | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | ||
| 19 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
| 20 | DETERING Julian | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% | |
| 21 | MORALES Ian N. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 22 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 44% | 12% |
| 23 | LE Jacob W. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 24 | GOLDADE Luke A. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% | |
| 25 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% | |
| 26 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | LLIDO Soren | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 28 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | - | 8% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | NGUYEN Liam | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 12% | 38% | 41% | 7% | ||
| 32 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 2% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | LI Ryan Z. | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | ||
| 34 | KIM Derek A. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 35 | ZHENG zhe | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 36 | ANDERSON Jacob | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | ELVANDER Ethan | 7% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | ||
| 39 | FANG Jaden | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | SISINNI Riccardo | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 41 | MYERS Dean | 11% | 45% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | YU Leo | 5% | 34% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | KIM Aaron J. | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
| 45 | OH Jaden | - | 8% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 46 | YEE Johnathan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 47 | WANG Ethan | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | TAN Peter | 4% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | SMITH Grant D. | 16% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | WU Lucas | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 51 | CHEN Brian | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 37% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ALFARO Sergio Raul O. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 54 | LI Jett | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 55 | AGRAWAL Niki | 13% | 54% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BOUCHARD Kai | 60% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | MO Jason | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 1% | ||
| 58 | LU Ruofei | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | HUANG Alston | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | LIU William | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | PORTER Rory | 70% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | LIN Po-Chen (Ryan) | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.