Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
2 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
3 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% | |
3 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 5% |
5 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
6 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 11% | |
7 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
8 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
9 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% |
10 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
11 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
12 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
13 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% | |
14 | VARGAS Bryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 6% | |
15 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
16 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
17 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
18 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | ||
19 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
20 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 7% | |
21 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
22 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 12% |
23 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
24 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% | |
25 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 4% | |
26 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% | |
27 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
28 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 91% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - |
29 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
30 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
31 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 7% | ||
32 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | ||
34 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
35 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
36 | ANDERSON Jacob | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
37 | ELVANDER Ethan | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
38 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | ||
39 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 89% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
40 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
41 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 89% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
42 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
42 | YU Leo | 100% | 95% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | |
44 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
45 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 91% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - |
46 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
47 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
48 | TAN Peter | 100% | 96% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | |
49 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
50 | WU Lucas | 100% | 96% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
51 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
52 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | ALFARO Sergio Raul O. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
54 | LI Jett | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
55 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 87% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
56 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
57 | MO Jason | 100% | 91% | 57% | 16% | 1% | ||
58 | LU Ruofei | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
58 | HUANG Alston | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
60 | LIU William | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
61 | PORTER Rory | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
61 | LIN Po-Chen (Ryan) | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
63 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.