Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 2 | KIM Byung | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | KATS Dylan G. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | SHCHUR Landon | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | IARIKOV Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | WU Jonathan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | SHA Michael | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | D D V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 9 | DODIN David | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | HEADRICK Lance | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | PALIWODA Nicholas | D V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | THAKUR Om S. | V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 14 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | NATSVLISHVILI John Vano | D V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 16 | BRODSKY Julian | V D D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | MAO Benjamin | V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 18 | BAMBRA Taranjot | V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | TRULL A.J. | V V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | NAKAS Levent | D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | CHEN Leonardo | D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 23 | WU Colin | V D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | LAI Boden | V V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 25 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | CHOU Benson | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | HEADRICK Jack | D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 28 | MEGGERS Davin | D V V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | HIGGASON Hugh | D V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | LIU Adam | D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | TSE Maxwell | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | CHOI Christian | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | MALHAM Andrew | D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 35 | TSANG William | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 36 | GINZBURG Adam | V D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 37 | ZENG Andrew | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 38 | KANG Brandon | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 39 | NILSEN Mark | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 40 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 41 | URBAN Leo | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 42 | LI Ray | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 43 | ZHAO Pierce | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 44 | WASSERMAN Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.