Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 2 | KIM Byung | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 29% |
| 3 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 46% | 35% |
| 3 | SHCHUR Landon | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 5 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 6 | WU Jonathan | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% | |
| 7 | SHA Michael | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 8 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 9 | DODIN David | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 46% | |
| 10 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 11 | HEADRICK Lance | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 6% | |
| 12 | PALIWODA Nicholas | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 13 | THAKUR Om S. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 45% | 20% | |
| 14 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 37% | 7% | |
| 15 | NATSVLISHVILI John Vano | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% | |
| 16 | BRODSKY Julian | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | MAO Benjamin | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 6% | |
| 18 | BAMBRA Taranjot | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 19 | TRULL A.J. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | NAKAS Levent | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 21 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 22 | CHEN Leonardo | 11% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | WU Colin | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 24 | LAI Boden | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | CHOU Benson | 7% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | HEADRICK Jack | 2% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | MEGGERS Davin | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HIGGASON Hugh | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LIU Adam | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | TSE Maxwell | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 32 | CHOI Christian | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | MALHAM Andrew | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | TSANG William | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - | |
| 36 | GINZBURG Adam | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | ZENG Andrew | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KANG Brandon | 20% | 45% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 39 | NILSEN Mark | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 41 | URBAN Leo | 6% | 40% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LI Ray | 33% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | ZHAO Pierce | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | WASSERMAN Jacob | 7% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.