The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
| 2 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | SARKAR Agniv | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
| 3 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% | |
| 5 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 6 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 25% |
| 7 | KUO Elvin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 8 | OLANDER Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 9 | WATT Darren | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
| 10 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 11 | KELLEY Thomas (TJ) J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% |
| 12 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | |
| 14 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | GU Aidan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 17 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | < 1% |
| 18 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 19 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 20 | LUONG Allen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% |
| 21 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 81% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 75% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | HAWKINS Laura A. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
| 27 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ANGADALA Leela Krishna | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KUO Michael | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 31 | AHMED Saheer | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 32 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 33 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 34 | SIMONI James | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | MEWES Katie M. | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.