SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WIECHMANN Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% |
| 2 | MARRAN Erik R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 3 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 3 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 5 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 6 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% |
| 7 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 8 | WEI HUNTER | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 9 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 10 | CHEN Jun Ho | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 11 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 12 | AYALA Jaime | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 13 | FUSSMAN Yuval | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 15 | TEH Steven | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | NABAVI Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 18 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | MORTON William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 20 | SHEN Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 37% |
| 21 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | WANG Max S | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 24 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | MING Isaac | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | BADEA Christian | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | WOLFSOHN Peleg | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 33 | ELKAN Raoul | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | WU Hongzhou | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 37 | KARASIN Mark | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | MARSH Alex | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | TORRES Gianni | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 40 | MCGUIRK Andrew | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | O'HARROW Tristan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 42 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 43 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | PRADHAN Aryan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 45 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% |
| 46 | HAUPT Tyler (Ty) S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 47 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 49 | BHATT Krish | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | CHOU Benson | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHEN ANDREW | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SIRICO John | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | PARK Patrick | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.