Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% |
| 2 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 3 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 3 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
| 5 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 6 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 10% | |
| 7 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 8 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 17% | |
| 9 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 10 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% |
| 11 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | |
| 12 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 13 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% | |
| 14 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 15 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
| 16 | WU Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 5% | |
| 18 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 19 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 20 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 22 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 23 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | 3% | |
| 24 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 8% | |
| 25 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 16% | |
| 26 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 13% | |
| 27 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 28 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | |
| 30 | AMRANI David | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 93% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | SULLIVAN Matthew | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 35 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 36 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | QI Steve | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
| 38 | MURDOCH Walter | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 74% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | GUO Hairuo | 100% | 90% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | WUJASTYK Leon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 44 | EXNICIOS Richard M. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | SATTAR Dylan | 100% | 74% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | ABANILLA Luke | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 47 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | FENG Michael | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 50 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | BROGAN Kevin | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 79% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | EXNICIOS Rex | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | HO Jor Sam | 100% | 50% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | SIANO Devon M. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.