Chesapeake Fencing Club - Towson, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
2 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
3 | CAO Brad | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
3 | SCHULZE Ethan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
5 | HE Lawrence | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
6 | MURPHY Thomas P. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
7 | SHREM Samuel G. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
8 | SERAFIN Ben | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
9 | LONGSTREET Jeffrey | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
10 | COLLEY Joshua | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% | |
11 | ZHANG Caden | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
12 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
13 | LIN Harrison | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | |
14 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
15 | TOMASZEWSKI Joshua | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 1% |
16 | CONLEY Seth | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - | |
17 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
18 | HUTZ Michael B. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
19 | SINGH Ravin | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
20 | KANG Eunwoo | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% | |
22 | SINGH Aryaman | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
22 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
24 | SO Lorenzo | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | |
25 | MOORTHY Gyan | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | MURPHY Megan | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | SOKOL Luke | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
28 | ZHANG Sen | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - | |
29 | MCGUIRK Andrew | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - | |
29 | HOLLOWAY Donald | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
31 | SAFKO Liubov V. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
32 | TOMASZEWSKI Simon | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
33 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
34 | CUCCIARRE Pace | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - | |
35 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% | |
36 | WIGHT Joseph M. | 1% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
37 | GORDON Rachel A. | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
38 | BOYKO Frank C. | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
39 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | |
40 | FOREST Sung | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
41 | SMITH Auynha | 41% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
42 | SEKOWSKI Jane | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - | |
43 | ASUNCION Arren | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.