RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SIU Aiden | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 2 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 3 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 5 | LYU Victor | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 6 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 7 | LI Avery Peihong | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 6% |
| 8 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
| 9 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 10 | RENTERIA Emiliano | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 11 | OH Jaden | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 13 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% | |
| 14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 15 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 16 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 1% | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 17 | CO Dylan | - | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 18 | WU Lucas | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 20 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 21 | KIM Aiden | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | LI Samuel | - | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | LE Jacob W. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 24 | SMITH Grant D. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 25 | GOBBO Alexander | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 26 | BAEK David | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | PONS Diego | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 28 | ZHENG zhe | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | |
| 29 | PARK Ryan | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | NGUYEN Martin | 2% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | MA Bryant | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | LING Eddie | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | LIPPMAN Sam | - | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | MA Andrew | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 35 | PARK Gabriel | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 36 | LI Matthew | - | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | PINCHENG Yao | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 3% | 39% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | PARK Sky | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 40 | PARK David | 17% | 44% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 42 | WU Alber Y. | - | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 43 | LLIDO Soren | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 44 | LAM Nicolas | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | JIANG Yehong | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | LE Jacob H. | 23% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | PARK Rion | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | TSAY Jordan R. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | CHOURASIA Ashirvad | 64% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | NAVARRO Kato | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | PATRICK Aiden | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 28% | 47% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | TAN Youkai (Isaac) | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
| 57 | POUND Michael | 26% | 46% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.