RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SIU Aiden | V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
2 | LUH Ethan K. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | JAIN Aditya | D V V V V V | V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
3 | CHIN Julian S. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
5 | LYU Victor | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
6 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
7 | LI Avery Peihong | D D V V D V | V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
8 | DETERING Julian | D V D V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
9 | FINNEY Lorenz | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
10 | RENTERIA Emiliano | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
11 | OH Jaden | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
12 | VALOUEV Aleksey | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
13 | CANLAS Nathan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
15 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
16 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V V D D D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
17 | CO Dylan | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | WU Lucas | V V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
19 | KRYLTSOV Michael | V V V V D V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
20 | DINSAY Kristjan | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
21 | KIM Aiden | V V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
22 | LI Samuel | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
23 | LE Jacob W. | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
24 | SMITH Grant D. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
25 | GOBBO Alexander | V V D V V D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
26 | BAEK David | D D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
27 | PONS Diego | V D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
28 | ZHENG zhe | D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
29 | PARK Ryan | D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
30 | NGUYEN Martin | D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
31 | MA Bryant | D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
32 | LING Eddie | D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
33 | LIPPMAN Sam | V V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
34 | MA Andrew | V V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
35 | PARK Gabriel | V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
36 | LI Matthew | D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
37 | PINCHENG Yao | D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
38 | TONKOVICH Ryan | V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
39 | PARK Sky | V D D D D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
40 | PARK David | D V V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
41 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | D V D D D V | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
42 | WU Alber Y. | V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
43 | LLIDO Soren | D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
44 | LAM Nicolas | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
45 | JIANG Yehong | D D V D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
46 | LE Jacob H. | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
47 | PARK Rion | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
48 | TSAY Jordan R. | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
49 | CHOURASIA Ashirvad | D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
50 | NAVARRO Kato | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
51 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
52 | PATRICK Aiden | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
53 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
54 | KALAMAS Nikolas | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
55 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
56 | TAN Youkai (Isaac) | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
57 | POUND Michael | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.