ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 2 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 3 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 3 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 19% |
| 5 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 6 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 7 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 9 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 10 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | |
| 11 | CULHANE Dechen | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 13 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 21% | |
| 14 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 17 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 18 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | SONG Noel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 21 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 21 | WANG Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 24 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | 3% | |
| 25 | BRENNEMAN Titus | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 27 | DALBERG Anders | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 28 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 31 | MUNDY Ezra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 9% | |
| 32 | LIU Eric | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 33 | WANG Auther | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 34 | SCHLACK Jake | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SION Andrew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 37 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | CHUNG Ian | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 40 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 95% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ARUL Girish | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | BLEIL Tyler | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | BROOKS Matthew | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | CROWE Adam D. | 100% | 85% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | TAE Ryan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 48 | BHAN Amar | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | WILSON Eric | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | MELESHKO-PETRAKOV Jonathan | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | MALHOTRA Siddharth | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SETHI Parth | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.