Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Riley | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 2 | BLISS Atticus H. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 3 | COX Matthew T. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 | BURTON Patrick | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 5 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 1% |
| 6 | MOSES Alexander | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 7 | GOLDMAN Rami | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 8 | CUMMINGS Kai W. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | GREEN Jake L. | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | BRONZO Justin G. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 11 | MUGA Boris | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | JONES Dominic R. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 13 | TODREAS Simon | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 14 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 3% | - |
| 15 | STEVENS James F. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 17 | MAENG Jake W. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 18 | DRAKE Owen G. | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | LI Brian X | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 20 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 21 | YAO Shun | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | SMITH Jackson | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 23 | XIAO Zherui | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 24 | PARK Jong-Eun | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 25 | HOLDERNESS Landon | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 26 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | LAWLER Aidan | 5% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 29 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 30 | GUMAGAY Paul | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 31 | SMITH Nicholas S. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 32 | BURCH Tristan H. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | HU Alexander W. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | KAEDING Alexander (Alex) B. | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | WEISE Eli S. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | VANDERVELDE Pierce F. | 20% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 38 | LIANG Aaron | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 39 | MORSE Tyler | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 40 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | 3% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SMAY II Joseph E. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | KUHN Jeffrey | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | PARTRIDGE Lucas F. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 44 | LIPTON Michael D. | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | THORESON Gary C. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
| 48 | VAN VOORHEES Andrew | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | RYAN Christopher | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 10% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 53 | KATOPES Peter | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 11% | 35% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | SMITH Brandon J. | 16% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 37% | 40% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.