Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 2 | BLISS Atticus H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 9% |
| 3 | COX Matthew T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | BURTON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 10% |
| 5 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 1% |
| 6 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 7 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | CUMMINGS Kai W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 9 | GREEN Jake L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | BRONZO Justin G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 11 | MUGA Boris | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | JONES Dominic R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | TODREAS Simon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 14 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 15 | STEVENS James F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 17 | MAENG Jake W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 18 | DRAKE Owen G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | LI Brian X | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 20 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 21 | YAO Shun | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 10% |
| 23 | XIAO Zherui | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | PARK Jong-Eun | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 25 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 26 | ROMERO Caleb E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | LAWLER Aidan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 9% |
| 30 | GUMAGAY Paul | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 31 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 32 | BURCH Tristan H. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | HU Alexander W. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | KAEDING Alexander (Alex) B. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | WEISE Eli S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | VANDERVELDE Pierce F. | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | WESTMAAS Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 38 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 39 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 40 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SMAY II Joseph E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 42 | KUHN Jeffrey | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | PARTRIDGE Lucas F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 44 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | KRUGER Mark (Mark Kruger) | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 46 | THORESON Gary C. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KASTENBERG Leo M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | VAN VOORHEES Andrew | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | RYAN Christopher | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KIRSCH Adam J. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | SPENCER Richard (Spenc) E. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 53 | KATOPES Peter | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | SMITH Brandon J. | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 100% | 63% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.