Forge Fencing Academy & Club - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GRASS Andrew E. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 55% |
2 | HUTH Jacob | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
3 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
3 | STANLEY Mason B. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 59% |
5 | LI Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | |
6 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
7 | OH SEAN | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% | |
8 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 12% | |
9 | LIMA Kevin M. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
10 | BERNABE Rafael | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - |
11 | BRUCE Roman | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
12 | KAUNITZ Emmanuel | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
13 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
14 | EMENHEISER Conrad | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
15 | VIVEROS Antonio | 6% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
16 | MUELLER Donn | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 1% |
17 | LAUSI Patrick M. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 27% | 2% |
18 | DAVIS Mitchell | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | |
19 | SLOUGH Sean | 2% | 22% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | |
20 | GUEVARRA Gerhard V. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 2% |
21 | BLONDEL Leo O. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
22 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | - | 2% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - |
23 | GUEVARRA Gabriel (Gabe) W. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
24 | HUTH Trevor | - | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
25 | SMOLICH Marat | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
26 | VIVEROS Evan | - | 1% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
27 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | IFORD Andrew W. | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
29 | CAO Vincent | 54% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
30 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
31 | KARNAVAS William | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
32 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | - | |
33 | ALAMI Faisal | 11% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
34 | BURSON Owen | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | MILES Greyson | 46% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
36 | LAWRENCE Addison | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
37 | KAPLAN Abe | 42% | 53% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
38 | SMITH Sean | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | NOLAN Tyler | 47% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | HARWOOD Gray | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.