Forge Fencing Academy & Club - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GRASS Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% |
2 | HUTH Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
3 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% |
3 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% |
5 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
6 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
7 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | |
8 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% | |
9 | LIMA Kevin M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
10 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - |
11 | BRUCE Roman | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
12 | KAUNITZ Emmanuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
13 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
14 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
15 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 94% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
16 | MUELLER Donn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 1% |
17 | LAUSI Patrick M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | 2% |
18 | DAVIS Mitchell | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | |
19 | SLOUGH Sean | 100% | 98% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | |
20 | GUEVARRA Gerhard V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | 2% |
21 | BLONDEL Leo O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
22 | MURRAY-GRAMLICH Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - |
23 | GUEVARRA Gabriel (Gabe) W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
24 | HUTH Trevor | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
25 | SMOLICH Marat | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | |
26 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
27 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | IFORD Andrew W. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
29 | CAO Vincent | 100% | 46% | 6% | - | - | - | |
30 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
31 | KARNAVAS William | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
32 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 100% | 84% | 43% | 9% | - | - | |
33 | ALAMI Faisal | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
34 | BURSON Owen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
35 | MILES Greyson | 100% | 54% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
36 | LAWRENCE Addison | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
37 | KAPLAN Abe | 100% | 58% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
38 | SMITH Sean | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | NOLAN Tyler | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | HARWOOD Gray | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.