Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 2 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 3 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 3 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
| 5 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 6 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
| 7 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 8 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 14% |
| 9 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 10 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 11 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 12 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
| 13 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 14 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 15 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 17 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% | |
| 18 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 19 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 20 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% |
| 21 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% | 7% |
| 22 | WU Lucas | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 24 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 30% | |
| 25 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 28 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | MA Bryant | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 30 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
| 31 | KIM Minhyeok | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 32 | PARK Rion | 100% | 92% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 34 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | WEI Qiancheng (Matt) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 37 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% | |
| 39 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% | 1% | |
| 40 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 40 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 42 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 44 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 46 | KHER Roan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | PARK Sky | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 51 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 53 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | LO Preston | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 57 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 57 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 59 | BAEK David | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 60 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 61 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 61 | HUANG Alston | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LI Jett | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | 1% | |
| 64 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 68 | ATTIA Aly | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | MO Jason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 70 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 71 | TAN Peter | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 72 | DALVA Michael | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 73 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 81% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
| 74 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | PONS Diego | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 76 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 77% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 78 | YORK Lucas | 100% | 38% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 79 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 80 | ALFARO Sergio Raul O. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 81 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 82 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | SAH Steven | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 84 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 85 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | BUTLER Owen | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | ELVANDER Ethan | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | LIN Po-Chen (Ryan) | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.