Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | - | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
2 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | |
3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
3 | LI Eric | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
5 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% | |
6 | LI Richard | - | - | 5% | 28% | 47% | 20% | |
7 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 47% | |
8 | BING Charles | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
9 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
10 | WU Alexander | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
11 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 28% | 4% | |
12 | ADLER David R. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 17% | |
13 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
14 | ACHILOV Sayid | - | 2% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | |
15 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% | |
16 | GONG Benjamin | - | 1% | 14% | 42% | 35% | 8% | |
17 | SEZER Kaya | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
18 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 39% | 2% |
19 | LIN Michael | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 40% | 11% | |
20 | DU Samuel R. | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 42% | 13% | |
21 | CHENG Jonathan | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% | |
22 | JUDD Mehta J. | - | 6% | 39% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
23 | LANG Dong Lin | - | 3% | 31% | 44% | 19% | 3% | |
24 | LI Arvin | 1% | 12% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
25 | PO Oliver | 2% | 18% | 46% | 27% | 6% | - | |
26 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
27 | XU Ethan | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
28 | HE Xiangrui | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | LI Aaron | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
30 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 4% | |
31 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
32 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 30% | 5% | |
33 | TEMPLE Jackson | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
34 | MIALL Steven A. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
35 | JIANG Owen | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | |
36 | JOSEPH Willem | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 26% | 4% | |
37 | LEE Jonah | 2% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | - | |
38 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | 9% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
39 | KHANDELWAL Jay | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
40 | WANG Mason | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
41 | LI Ayren | 12% | 49% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | TAHOUN Mostafa | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | - |
43 | SIEGEL Elliot | - | - | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% | |
44 | WANG Rory | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
45 | MILLER Aidan A. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
46 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
47 | WU Dawei | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
47 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 3% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
49 | WECHSLER Jacob | 1% | 10% | 36% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
50 | SATTAR Dylan | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
51 | SONG Bryan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
52 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 1% | 16% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | |
53 | LU Howen | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
54 | GALLER Dave | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
55 | CHESSA Giovanni | 23% | 53% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | LIU Derek | 3% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
57 | KLYCZEK Andrew | - | 38% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | |
58 | JIN Dennis H. | 35% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | VO Jonathan | 44% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - | |
60 | CHUA Kirby | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
61 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 21% | 66% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
62 | MENG Zhaoyi | 1% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
63 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | 52% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | |
64 | POPE Alexander | 23% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
65 | TANG xianchi | 58% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
66 | YU Stephen | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
67 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 13% | 52% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
68 | LAO Kevin | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
68 | GARDINER Luke J. | 41% | 51% | 8% | - | - | - | |
70 | YANG Dylan | 72% | 27% | 1% | - | - | - | |
71 | TAM Kyle | 99% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
72 | CANEDO James | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
73 | AMRANI David | 14% | 44% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.