Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% |
| 2 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
| 3 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | |
| 3 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 5 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | |
| 6 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 20% | |
| 7 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% | |
| 8 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | |
| 9 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | |
| 10 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
| 11 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 32% | 4% | |
| 12 | ADLER David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 17% | |
| 13 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 14 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 27% | 4% | |
| 15 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
| 16 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 8% | |
| 17 | SEZER Kaya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
| 18 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | 2% |
| 19 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 11% | |
| 20 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 13% | |
| 21 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% | |
| 22 | JUDD Mehta J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% | 15% | 1% | |
| 23 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 66% | 22% | 3% | |
| 24 | LI Arvin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 40% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | PO Oliver | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | XU Ethan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | LI Aaron | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 4% | |
| 31 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | |
| 32 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 5% | |
| 33 | TEMPLE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 34 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 16% | |
| 35 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 16% | |
| 36 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | 4% | |
| 37 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 38 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
| 39 | KHANDELWAL Jay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 40 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 41 | LI Ayren | 100% | 88% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% | - |
| 43 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 18% | |
| 44 | WANG Rory | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 46 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% | |
| 47 | WU Dawei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
| 47 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 49 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
| 50 | SATTAR Dylan | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 52 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 36% | 6% | - | |
| 53 | LU Howen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 54 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | CHESSA Giovanni | 100% | 77% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | LIU Derek | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 57 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 56% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | CHUA Kirby | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 79% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 99% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 63 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | 100% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 64 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 65 | TANG xianchi | 100% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 66 | YU Stephen | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 67 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 87% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
| 68 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 59% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 72 | CANEDO James | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 73 | AMRANI David | 100% | 86% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.