Boston Fencing Club ROC

Div II Men's Épée

Sunday, October 30, 2022 at 3:00 PM

Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 JOSLIN Tyler 100% 100% 98% 80% 40% 7%
2 OSTIGUY Cameron 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 48% 14%
3 DEPOMMIER Remi 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 35%
3 BEALS Alden 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 27% 5%
5 REDDY Arya 100% 99% 93% 67% 31% 8% 1%
6 JENNINGS Adin 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 26%
7 BOYNTON Zachariah (Zach) G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 65%
8 CHALLAGULLA Manu 100% 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 4%
9 DALY Conor 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
10 ZOU Xianyang 100% 97% 83% 52% 21% 5% -
11 BOGUSLAVSKY Daniel 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
12 GRAYSON Joshua 100% 96% 74% 35% 7% -
13 CHOI Aleksey 100% 100% 96% 77% 38% 8%
14 ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 58% 19%
15 TORRES Gianni 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 6%
16 MRAK Michael R. 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 29%
17 MATEI Daniel 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 23%
18 VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas 100% 100% 99% 82% 42% 9%
19 CAFASSO Martin 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 21% 3%
20 XIE Brandon 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 22% 4%
21 KUBATIN Anton V. 100% 100% 96% 82% 52% 21% 4%
22 THOMPSON Ian 100% 99% 89% 60% 26% 6% 1%
23 MACNEILL Owen 100% 99% 92% 70% 37% 11% 1%
24 LIU Jeremiah W. 100% 98% 84% 50% 18% 3% -
25 SANTOS Felipe 100% 100% 99% 87% 50% 12%
26 DJONOUMA Toyohm 100% 100% 92% 63% 24% 4%
27 SONG Troy 100% 99% 86% 48% 13% 1%
28 PAPSUN Benjamin J. 100% 100% 95% 62% 21% 3%
29 PAN Anthony 100% 81% 41% 11% 1% -
30 GERSEN Jacob 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
31 HARE John R. 100% 100% 94% 68% 28% 5%
32 WANG Justin 100% 99% 88% 56% 19% 2%
33 MARSHALL William L. 100% 100% 100% 96% 73% 29%
34 MASSE Jack 100% 85% 43% 11% 1% -
35 QUINLAN Sean 100% 100% 99% 88% 57% 16%
36 MARINI Davide 100% 96% 63% 23% 4% -
37 JIANG Ryan 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
38 FENG Du 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 4%
39 DOWD Peter L. 100% 50% 13% 2% - - -
40 FROLICH Grant 100% 98% 88% 63% 30% 8% 1%
41 PEDERSEN Christopher C. 100% 100% 97% 80% 39% 7%
42 NORTON Theo B. 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 7%
43 KOPPENHEFFER Rowan 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 6% 1%
44 SCHIAVONE Oreste 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 13% 2%
45 EANG Brynner 100% 98% 86% 59% 27% 7% 1%
46 WU Chi Kuan 100% 70% 25% 5% - - -
47 URQUHART Grant 100% 90% 58% 22% 3% -
48 MELCHER Charles 100% 99% 88% 56% 19% 3%
49 RITTERSHAUS Bryce 100% 87% 39% 8% 1% -
50 FEINBERG James Y. 100% 69% 15% 1% - -
51 BUTTS Brendan 100% 62% 19% 3% - -
52 HU Robert J. 100% 98% 84% 51% 19% 4% -
53 MCMILLAN Jackson V. 100% 78% 39% 12% 2% - -
54 JACKSON Nicholas 100% 95% 72% 37% 12% 2% -
55 PETERSEN Zachary 100% 94% 65% 28% 7% 1% -
56 KIRSCH Adam J. 100% 97% 81% 49% 19% 4% -
57 KELLEY Hayden 100% 73% 27% 5% - - -
58 MILES Ronald D. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
59 ROSENBLUM Addison J. 100% 56% 16% 2% - - -
60 SAULSBERRY Saliim 100% 49% 6% - - -
60 GAO "George" Xiaojiang 100% 93% 65% 27% 5% -
62 MILLSON Daniel 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 8% 1%
63 LI Ray 100% 21% 2% - - -
64 CHENG Bingyi 100% 80% 42% 13% 2% - -
65 WHITE Aidan 100% 39% 5% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.