The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% | |
2 | ULINICH Alexander | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 39% | 2% | |
3 | HELGE James R. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
3 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
5 | RAJ Shrey | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
6 | WICKBOLDT Eric | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% |
7 | KUO Rylan | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
8 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
9 | LOGUE Ethan D. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 51% | 22% |
10 | SUORSA Markus | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
11 | LIU Noah | 1% | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
12 | WANG Xu-Chen | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
13 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 6% | 33% | 44% | 16% | |
14 | ZAYDMAN David M. | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
15 | CLAES Lucas | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
16 | LAURIMAA Emil | - | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
17 | SIRBU Dan | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | - | |
18 | WONG Kevin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
19 | BHARGAV Angad | 17% | 47% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
20 | BARNETT Devin | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 6% | - | |
21 | HANSEN Kira | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
22 | KOERBER Christopher T. | - | 6% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
23 | MING Nathan | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
24 | WU Eric | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
25 | YUEN Nathan | 9% | 37% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
26 | MARIANI Lou | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
27 | HOFMAN Haejung | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
28 | CHANG Andrew | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
29 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
30 | MIMURA Shawn M. | - | - | < 1% | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
31 | WISHART Eric | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
32 | KUO Michael | 10% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
33 | ENRILE Erica | 5% | 32% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
34 | CHA Eugenie | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | ESTRADA Ariana | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
36 | BENNETT Peter | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
37 | MADRID Maureen | 55% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - | |
38 | SIMONI James (Jim) V. | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | SULLIVAN Brendan | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.