The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | |
| 2 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 2% | |
| 3 | HELGE James R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 3 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 5 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 2% |
| 6 | WICKBOLDT Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% |
| 7 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 8 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 22% |
| 10 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 11 | LIU Noah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 12 | WANG Xu-Chen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 16% | |
| 14 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 12% | |
| 15 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 94% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 17 | SIRBU Dan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 11% | - | |
| 18 | WONG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 19 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 83% | 36% | 5% | - | - | |
| 20 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 21 | HANSEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 22 | KOERBER Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 23 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | WU Eric | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 25 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 91% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | |
| 27 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 30 | MIMURA Shawn M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 31 | WISHART Eric | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | KUO Michael | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 95% | 63% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ESTRADA Ariana | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | BENNETT Peter | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | MADRID Maureen | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | SIMONI James (Jim) V. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | SULLIVAN Brendan | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.