Nova Fencing Club - Falls Church, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ABBOUD Michael | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 2 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 3 | HULL Liam | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 3 | CARNALL Hunter | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 5 | PENNER Kyle D. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 6 | SO Lorenzo | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
| 8 | MODANLOU Navid | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 9 | FU Ethan | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 10 | TRITHART Jacob M. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 2% |
| 11 | ZHANG Andy | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 12 | PETROW Zoryan | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | BANNEN Nicholas | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | BLACK Ethan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 15 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 16 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 17 | PALAMARCHUK Andriy | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 18 | MEGGERS Davin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 19 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | WU Shaochi | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | WEIDMAN Jess | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 22 | MEGGERS Samuel | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | SAUNIER Cameron | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 24 | HVIDING Ketil | - | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 25 | ARMSTRONG Gary | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 26 | ALI Farhan | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | GARCIA Carlos | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 28 | ROINIOTIS Theodore | 11% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | DREYER Nadia S. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | EVANS Allen L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 31 | MORA Genesis R. | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PILIPOWSKYJ Luke | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | SZYMCZYK Lex | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 12% |
| 35 | FRENCH Phaelen | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 37 | PANE Patrick | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 38 | SJOBERG Samuel | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 39 | CANDELARIA Armando | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 40 | BUI Ryan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | HUEY Curtis E. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 42 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | DIAZ Brenna | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | NAZIRALI Syedeen | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 45 | VADDE Prateek | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | VADDE Pranav | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WEST Dale | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | LAZURAN Daniel | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | THORN Evan | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | PETRY Luke | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 52 | VENCILL Nicholas | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | STERLING Henry | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | ERBER Liberty | 4% | 29% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | MARTIN Audrey | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.